EyezOn Data · Competitive Intelligence

Quantix Free-Channel — Verified Benchmark

196 calls from @quantix_free, checked against real on-chain trading data. No estimates.

196
Calls verified
28.6%
Hit 2x or more
+198.5%
Best-case ceiling P&L
153
Paid calls captured
The finding

A real, repeatable filter.

Quantix's selection filter is consistent and copyable (below): pump.fun-only, posted after graduation, in a set mcap band. Within the 196 calls they posted, the variables we could measure — mcap, token age, holder concentration, KOL count — did not separate the 2x+ tokens from the rest in this sample. 28.6% hit 2x. Outcomes tracked the broader market more than any single tell we tested.

Their selection filter · copyable

Why these tickers

  • pump.fun only — 196/196 calls, zero other launchpads.
  • Posted after graduation — median ~10 min after the DEX pool goes live, never before.
  • Mcap band $49K–$213K, median $54K — always above the graduation line.
  • No fixed age gate — 4 min to 24 hrs, median ~34 min.

pump.fun tokens migrate at a fixed ~411 SOL, so the $ migration mcap moves with SOL price (≈ $31.5K at current SOL ~$76.56, vs. the often-cited $69K figure from when SOL was ~$168). source, source. All 196 of Quantix's posts sit above that line, posted a median ~10 min after the DEX pool goes live.

Every call, ranked

Peak multiple, all 196 calls

Entry mcap (their free call) vs. verified on-chain peak. 56 of 196 (28.6%) hit 2x+. Tap a group to expand.

Checked every angle

None separated winners in this sample

Market cap at call

Token age at call

Top-10 holder %

KOL mentioned?

Three real examples

Three calls, three outcomes

Bot or human? (evidence)▸

Automated scanner, not a hand-picking human — templated posts, round-the-clock, auto-alerts at exact 2x/3x/4x thresholds.

Signs it's a bot

    Ambiguous

      00:0006:0012:0018:0023:00
      All 196 calls · full data table▸
      Ticker Name CA PRO mcap Free mcap ATH mcap Pro age* Free age KOLs Multiple Status